Difference between revisions of "Fossil and Friends Start Drama"

From Yanfly.moe Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 73: Line 73:
  
 
| [[File:FossilDrama_Part1_005.jpg|400px]]
 
| [[File:FossilDrama_Part1_005.jpg|400px]]
| Comment
+
| It was getting late for me so I didn't want to deal with it.
 +
I figured if anything, settling it in court would be better than prancing around with someone who probably doesn't even know programming all that well.
 +
 
 +
The next odd thing I'm hearing from this person is that I'm "infringing" upon a library under the MIT license.
 +
I don't know about you, but something about that doesn't sound right.
 +
"Infringement" refers to the violation of a law, but the only thing I can think of regarding this is "copyright law".
 +
But even then, that's under MIT. Still, suspicious.
 +
 
 +
In addition to that, he still refused to answer me which "community members" are responsible for letting him know this information.
  
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
 
|- style="vertical-align:top;"

Revision as of 14:41, 17 August 2021

Welcome to the wiki! This is where you can find resources from Yanfly.moe, Ækashics.moe,
VisuStella, Caz Wolf, Fallen Angel Olivia, Atelier Irina, and other affiliated content creators.


Introduction

August is one magical month. It's the month where people like to seem like to get angry and defecate onto other people's otherwise peaceful lives for no reason. No good reason, I should say. Restart, the creator of Fossil MZ, decided to do just that.

Part 1. Accusations

FossilDrama Part1 001.jpg Out of the blue, I got this direct message in Discord one day.

The first thing that comes to mind is how strangely worded this whole thing is. Why?

  1. It's extremely vague with what is the actual problem.
  2. It's extremely vague with who actually "verified" the problem.
  3. It's extremely vague why I need to be there in person to answer questions.

And for those wondering, he never answered which are the members that "verified" this.

FossilDrama Part1 001b.jpg I'm sorry, but when I see people texting and driving, it angers me. It reeks of irresponsibility.
FossilDrama Part1 002.jpg I don't understand why this couldn't have been stated in his initial post. Is it so hard to say "I think there's a potential copyright violation with your Dragonbones Union plugin" to get the point instead of skirting around?

I also don't know why this is even a copyright violation in the first place since the MV plugin is something that both The Green Kel and I have collaborated on. Apparently, I can infringe upon my own copyrighted work?

FossilDrama Part1 003.jpg Do you want to know why I'm so confident that we aren't using the code from the KELYEP_DragonBones.js?

That's because we tried to use it and it wasn't compatible with the new PixiJS version.

This was attempted three times over.

  1. First attempt was a direct port.
  2. Second attempt was a modified port.
  3. Third attempt was a PixiJS function reversion. It "worked" but it also broke everything else. However, that's a story for another day.

Ultimately, we decided the best course of action was to recreate the integration from the ground up.

FossilDrama Part1 004.jpg He shows one function that had an argument (what he calls a "variable") that was unused.

This is what tipped me off to something strange: Any kind of programmer should know full well there are differences between "variables" and "arguments" but semantics, so I digress.

Furthermore, unused arguments aren't uncommon. Look at RPG Maker MZ's coresripts. There are functions all over the place that have unused arguments.

FossilDrama Part1 004b.jpg

Like that.

However, at this point, I'm still unsure at what he's trying to get at.

FossilDrama Part1 005.jpg It was getting late for me so I didn't want to deal with it.

I figured if anything, settling it in court would be better than prancing around with someone who probably doesn't even know programming all that well.

The next odd thing I'm hearing from this person is that I'm "infringing" upon a library under the MIT license. I don't know about you, but something about that doesn't sound right. "Infringement" refers to the violation of a law, but the only thing I can think of regarding this is "copyright law". But even then, that's under MIT. Still, suspicious.

In addition to that, he still refused to answer me which "community members" are responsible for letting him know this information.

FossilDrama Part1 006.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 007.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 008.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 009.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 010.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 011.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 012.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 013.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 014.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 015.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 016.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 017.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 018.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 019.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 020.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 021.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 022.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 023.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 024.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 025.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 026.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 027.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 028.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 029.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 030.jpg Comment
FossilDrama Part1 031.jpg Comment